What is the role of AI in engineering traceability today?

Living with broken traceability in engineering

‍

If you’ve led an engineering project in the past five years, you know the feeling. Requirements management moves faster than teams can align. Product variants multiply, each carrying its own exceptions. Software integration slips, and verification becomes a guessing game. Test results arrive from another continent with no clear link to the requirements they were meant to validate.

‍

You end up managing engineering like a puzzle where half the pieces are missing and the box has no picture. Meetings are filled with the same questions: What exactly changed in the last requirement revision? Which variant is this defect tied to? How do we know if the last software patch broke a certified function? Each question reveals the same root problem: fragmented engineering data with no reliable traceability.

‍

Why fragmented engineering data breaks traceability

‍

The challenge is not careless engineers or weak processes. The challenge is knowledge fragmentation across tools and teams:

‍

• Requirements live in requirements management systems.
• CAD models stay in design environments.
• BOMs are tracked in ERP systems.
• Lifecycle metadata sits in PLM platforms.
• Test results are logged in separate databases.

‍

Each domain system is excellent on its own, but none provides a unifying reasoning layer. Dependencies remain hidden, and the impact of a requirement change is invisible until it surfaces downstream as a defect or delay. Software teams integrate late because their cycles are disconnected from hardware. Test engineers record failures but cannot trace them upstream to violated requirements.

‍

The consequences are predictable: delays, costly rework, compliance risks, and reactive decisions. Leaders cannot answer basic questions: Which requirements are validated? Which functions are at risk? How close are we to a stable baseline? Without a digital thread of traceability, risk multiplies.

‍

Why traditional traceability fixes no longer work?

‍

For years, organisations have tried to patch fragmentation with process discipline and integration projects. Teams manually reconcile data using spreadsheets. Managers convene review meetings to align stakeholders. IT builds point-to-point integrations between CAD, PLM, and ERP.

‍

These fixes do not scale. Modern programs involve thousands of requirements, hundreds of variants, global supply chains, and distributed engineering teams. Manual reconciliation is unsustainable. Point integrations move data but do not enable reasoning across dependencies. Review meetings consume time but cannot replace a living, automated system of traceability.

‍

Without AI-powered verification and validation, traceability remains fragile, costly, and incomplete.

‍

The cost of broken traceability in verification and validation

‍

The absence of end-to-end traceability does more than slow teams down; it undermines assurance itself. Whether launching a new product or undergoing certification, organisations must prove that requirements are satisfied by design and validated by test.

‍

When traceability is broken:

‍

• Evidence has to be reconstructed manually, introducing errors and delays.
• Requirement changes ripple through CAD, BOMs, and test cases undetected.
• Test failures cannot be linked upstream, leaving functions at risk.
• Engineers waste time reconciling data instead of innovating.
• Managers lose predictability and cannot forecast delivery confidence.

‍

The cost is measured in budget overruns, compliance failures, and lost innovation capacity.

‍

From fragmented data to AI-powered traceability

‍

Digitalisation has improved tools, but silos remain. The solution is not just integration, it is a paradigm shift to AI-powered traceability.

‍

This new approach builds a digital thread across the engineering lifecycle, linking every requirement, CAD model, BOM entry, and test result. Using knowledge graphs, dependencies become explicit and computable. Instead of hidden relationships, data is structured for reasoning, automation, and prediction.

‍

AI-powered applications enable :

‍

• Impact analysis of requirement.
• Automated compliance checks against CAD and BOMs.
• Real-time verification & validation as artefacts evolve.

‍

In short, AI-powered engineering data intelligence transforms traceability into a living system rather than a static report.

‍

What AI-driven traceability enables

‍

Adopting AI-powered, model-based traceability delivers benefits across the lifecycle:

‍

• Continuous verification & validation: Compliance checks run automatically as data evolves.
• Impact forecasting: Changes instantly show affected CAD parts, BOM items, and test cases.
• Scalable assurance: Programmes with hundreds of variants are managed confidently through a digital thread of traceability.

‍

This is more than efficiency. It transforms traceability from a compliance burden into a strategic advantage.

‍

Where AI-powered traceability is already emerging

‍

The shift is already happening:

‍

• Data consolidation and verification integrates information from CAD, BOMs, and ECAD into graph-based structures to detect mismatches instantly.
• AI rule checkers ensure CAD models respect design standards.
• Automated BOM-to-drawing validation guarantees documentation consistency.
• Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) embeds traceability into design logic.

‍

This is where platforms like Dessia Technologies stand out. Dessia’s AI libraries and AI-Apps connect directly to CAD and PLM. They don’t replace existing tools — they enhance them, creating a living digital thread of engineering data. BOMs, drawings, and requirements become aligned automatically, and traceability becomes computable, scalable, and continuous.

‍

The future: traceability as a competitive advantage

‍

Engineering leaders no longer need to accept broken traceability. By adopting AI-powered, model-based systems engineering approaches, they can unify requirements, CAD, BOMs, and tests into a coherent digital thread.

‍

The impact is profound:

‍

• Meetings shift from debating data status to deciding actions.
• Engineers focus on innovation instead of reconciliation.
• Leaders gain visibility, control, and confidence.

‍

In this future, traceability automation is not just compliance; it is the foundation of digital engineering. It enables faster design cycles, fewer errors, stronger certification, and scalable innovation. What was once a burden becomes a competitive advantage.

‍